“It's Not About The Sex” My Ass
  • Home
  • Preview book
  • Order book
  • Interviews
  • What is a cult?
  • About Joanne
  • Contact Joanne

On Mormon women seeking priesthood ordination

3/23/2014

1 Comment

 

The irony of the Ordain Women movement

A group of Mormons aptly calling themselves Ordain Women are continuing their grassroots campaign aimed at changing the church’s policy barring women from its alleged priesthood.

We could understand why concerned outsiders might pressure the church to forsake its sexist practices. Mormons, drilled from birth to obey and never to question their (male) leaders, are hardly likely to do so for themselves.*
Picture
Ironic colors intended
We find it curious, however, when believing Mormons mount a grassroots campaign. The LDS Church’s foundational claim is that God guides it by revelation. A grassroots campaign in effect denies that claim. Why remain in a religion whose foundational claim you reject?

We can suggest some possible reasons: family pressure, social pressure, social advantages, dependence on church welfare, group security, sunk cost fallacy, and post-purchase rationalization, to name a few. All of these are quite human and therefore quite understandable, even though none argues for an iota of truth to the religion itself.
*Thus it is no wonder that a 2011 Pew Research Center poll, which the LDS Church cites in its defense, found that 90 percent of Mormon women and 84 percent of Mormon men oppose ordaining women.
1 Comment

Dismissed!

3/20/2014

0 Comments

 

Mormon fraud case:
Dismissed.

Told ya.

Per Judge Howard Riddle, chief magistrate in Westminster Magistrates’ Court: “To convict, a jury would need to be sure that the religious teachings of the Mormon church are untrue or misleading. No judge in a secular court in England and Wales would allow that issue to be put to a jury.”
Picture
We understand why a judge would shrink from that can of worms. Really we do. But we find it regrettable. Not just the Mormon Church, but most churches make myriad allegations of fact that evidence contradicts. When any organization, even a church, persists in making demonstrably false statements and uses those statements to take money from followers, there are no two ways about it. It is FRAUD. And FRAUD is very much an issue to bring before a jury.

As we noted in our prior post, if Monson, the Pope, Pat Robertson, or any of a host of others were lone fortune-tellers using “beliefs” to take a mark’s money, no judge would hesitate to haul them before a jury, and no jury would hesitate to convict them. For that matter, any secular organization doing the same would be summarily indicted and convicted.
When it comes to using fraudulent claims to take people’s money, religion deserves no pass.

Click here to read more in The Salt Lake Tribune.
0 Comments

UK issues fraud summons to Mormon head

3/17/2014

0 Comments

 

UK files summons Mormon
leader on fraud charges

Exploratory criminal proceedings have begun against Mormon prophet Thomas S. Monson in the UK. The case alleges that Monson has made or caused to be made demonstrably false claims to exact funds from believers. Read about the proceedings by clicking here.

The party bringing charges maintains that their case is not against the Mormon religion, but against a representative who has made provably fraudulent claims. It is that admittedly fine line that has allowed the case to progress.
Picture
Mormon “prophet” Thomas S. Monson
For its part, the Mormon Church has argued that its claims are statements of belief, not fact. This walks an even finer line, and it may ultimately come back to haunt the church, given that every discourse by a Mormon leader ends with words to the effect of, “I know this church is true, I know that Joseph Smith was a prophet, I know that The Book of Mormon is the word of God.”

This marks the first time that criminal fraud charges have been brought against a Mormon Church leader since the 1826 conviction of Joseph Smith. (Criminal charges brought against Brigham Young, who succeeded Smith, were for polygamy.) Before claiming prophethood and starting a church, Smith claimed to be able to locate buried treasure by use of a “seer stone.” When he failed to produce the least amount of treasure for his clients, one of them pressed charges. Smith would later claim to use a seer stone to translate The Book of Mormon.

Though we think the case has merit, we think the odds of a conviction are nil. On the merit side, the only difference between a fortune-teller who exacts money for curse removal—for which criminal convictions are routinely obtained in the US—and a church that exacts “donations” for equally unprovable claims is one of scale. It is that matter of scale that brings us to the nil side. Going after individual fortune-tellers is one thing; going after a full-fledged religion is quite another. The charges in the case at hand are arguably applicable to religion in general. Legit or not, we doubt that the UK will want to open such a precedent-setting can of worms.

Which we think is a shame. We would like to see it opened there and in the US. There is no bigger con than religion. In the immortal words of the late George Carlin:
Religion easily has the greatest bullshit story every told ... Religion has convinced people that there's an invisible man ... living in the sky. Who watches everything you do every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a list of ten specific things he doesn't want you to do. And if you do any of these things, he will send you to a special place, of burning and fire and smoke and torture and anguish for you to live forever, and suffer, and suffer, and burn, and scream, until the end of time. But he loves you. He loves you. He loves you and he needs money.
•     •     •
0 Comments
    Picture
    Please share this site with friends by clicking on your favorites here:

    Reader reviews:
    Amazon reader reviews
    Audible listener reviews
    iBooks reader reviews
    B&N/Nook reader reviews​
    Free Inquiry's review of It's Not About the Sex My Ass
    Richard Packham's review of It's Not About the Sex My Ass
    Picture

    What's the difference between a cult and a religious cult? Click here.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012