“It's Not About The Sex” My Ass
  • Home
  • Preview book
  • Order book
  • Interviews
  • What is a cult?
  • About Joanne
  • Contact Joanne

Blaming Brigham: Nice try.

12/10/2013

0 Comments

 

Mormon Church blames racist
policy on Brigham Young

PictureAll his fault? Hardly.
Until 1978, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) barred anyone of the “Negro Race” from its priesthood. Besides not being allowed to perform priesthood ordinances, this meant that blacks could not marry in a Mormon temple, a requirement for Eternal Life. In 1978, the church’s presiding body announced that God “... by revelation has confirmed that the long-promised day has come when every faithful, worthy man in the Church may receive the holy priesthood, with power to exercise its divine authority, and enjoy with his loved ones every blessing that flows therefrom, including the blessings of the temple.”

Last Friday, the Mormon Church added a page to its official website disclaiming the ban as having been doctrinal. Rather, the church argues, it was a practice started around 1850 by then-Mormon prophet Brigham Young, who acted not by revelation but as a product of the racist era in which he lived.

It is curious that God would let a harmful, heinous, discriminatory error persist for over 130 years rather than correct it immediately. It is curious that revoking a non-revelation required a revelation at all, let alone a “long-promised” one. It is curious that God would permit a mistake of this magnitude to take hold in the first place. Moreover, if God had nothing against blacks, what the hell took him so long to fix it? Why did he make the world await a “long promised day”?

Some celebrate the this new concession as the church “coming clean.” It is interesting that a church claiming to have and teach The Truth, and to be guided by divine revelation, would need to “come clean” in the first place. Meanwhile, statements that dark skin is a curse remain in Mormon scriptures such as the Book of Mormon and Pearl of Great Price (see verse 22).

For a policy that enabled and promoted discrimination against innocent people for over 130 years, and that led church leaders to make myriad racially incendiary statements during that time (which the new web page conveniently omits), human decency cries out for an official, heartfelt, groveling, sackcloth-and-ashes apology.

•     •     •
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Please share this site with friends by clicking on your favorites here:

    Reader reviews:
    Amazon reader reviews
    Audible listener reviews
    iBooks reader reviews
    B&N/Nook reader reviews​
    Free Inquiry's review of It's Not About the Sex My Ass
    Richard Packham's review of It's Not About the Sex My Ass
    Picture

    What's the difference between a cult and a religious cult? Click here.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012